Parliament is debating 4 versions of remain on the first April 2019, surely this a a joke.
Two are designed to remain completely, the other two are essentially our Parliament debating the future relationship on behalf of the EU despite them having rejected the Withdrawal Agreement which is required before we move forward.
Staggering, I hope the EU have had enough and throw us out after the 12th April!!
How are politicians more concerned about a holiday they booked
Seriously, it was clear months ago that their incompetence was leading to a no deal no-one wants. No one in business with half a brain cell would have booked a holiday until after this was sorted.
So, if the result of leaving without a deal was going to be so bad we were heading for a 30 year recession, would it not have been sensible to tell us before we voted to leave, rather than six weeks before we crash out because our politicians are incompetent.
Not my fault!
So, the results are in..
This joke of a Parliament prefers Mrs May to screw up the negotiation with the EU than entrusting the capitulation to Mr Corbyn.
What a great way to waste 24 hours..
Can we do it every day until we leave by default?
I am not a big fan of the Guardian, however some of their opinion writers are very amusing and scarily accurate in their observations.
My MP is right, the people clearly need a second vote as they obviously did not know what they were voting for.
So, can we re-run the 2017 election in which I held my nose and voted conservative to get a strong and stable government.
What an incompetent joke this parliament has become, at the moment I like many other feel politically homeless.
My MP Dr Sarah Wolleston originally came out for leave, she then said she wanted to stay. After the vote she wanted an EEA agreement (remarkably what the country were sold in a referendum regarding joining)
Now she says that the public did not know what they were voting for and we need a people's vote. This is code for staying in as everyone who suggests a people's vote calls for remain to be on the ballot and two leave choices, thereby splitting the leave vote and ensuring remain wins.
Dr Sarah Wolleston enjoys using a medical analogy to explain why the people, her voters were stupid and need to be asked again.
http://www.drsarah.org.uk/sarah's-blog/informed-consent-is-essential-before-brexit-surgery/2825
I would like to offer my own version.
Imagine you knew something was wrong in your body and so went to the experts for advice. You are then told something is not right and you have two choices. You can either do nothing in which case the problem will continue to develop with an unknown ending, or you can have surgery the effect of which is unknown.
So, you decide despite the risks to have the surgery and at that point you leave the details to the experts having given them consent to act collectively on your behalf and undertake the procedure.
Now, imagine your surprise when you are woken up on the operating table to be told that not only is the surgeon so incompetent they do not know what they are doing, but the medical team cannot agree on what surgery to undertake.
As a result, they want you to decide again, do you really want to have the surgery now you know they are incapable, or do you want to decide to not have the surgery which would be easier for the medical team, but leave you with the disease and an uncertain future you cannot control.
